大鬍子發問：追夢能否防巴克利？巴克利：小個對我來說都是烤翅大餐

Sir Charles on if Draymond could guard him "Cmon man", Baron and Shaq laughing at the thought of it

巴克利對於德雷蒙德-格林是否能防住他表示「得了吧，朋友」，拜倫-戴維斯和沙克聽了都大笑起來。

[–]evanslist 661 指標 6小時前

I'm not sure if anyone quite understands how much of a freak / force of nature Chuck was. Watch tape, read stats, whatever ... Quite simply, if he wanted to do something, he would do it. No one could guard him.

Shoutout to Kevin Johnson for disappearing in the Finals.

我不確定是否有人真的了解曾經巴克利的力量有多麼的變態，看看錄像，讀讀數據，不管怎樣...很簡單的道理，只要他想做什麼事情，他就會做到，沒人能防住他。

這裡我要對凱文-約翰遜說幾句，這傢伙在總決賽里完全隱身了。

[–]PelicansIHaveNoFiya 49 指標 5小時前

My god, Chuck had some power behind him.

我的天啊，查克的身體里真的有不可思議的力量。

[–]Xlow48 147 指標 4小時前

For real. There's a reason he as a 6'6 PF considers guys smaller than 6'10 to be 'little guys'. He was like a taller version of Westbrook, just an unreal athletic beast.

講道理說，巴克利作為一個6尺6的大前鋒認為身高低於6尺10的人都是「小個子」是有道理的，他就好像放大版的威斯布魯克，完全就是個不現實的運動能力怪物。

[–][OKC] Lonnie Sheltonsnap_wilson 48 指標 4小時前

Chuck says a lot of stupid shit, but he's right about this. Dude was a freight train in his prime, not even McHale or Rodman could contain him single-handedly. The only thing that could stop Chuck was Chuck himself.

雖然巴克利說過很多愚蠢的東西，但是這一次他是對的。他巔峰的時候就像一列貨運列車，就算是麥克海爾和羅德曼都無法單獨防住他。唯一能阻擋巴克利的人就是他自己。

[–]HornetsGoAraJjang 10 指標 55 分鐘前

Freight train power was one thing, but one thing that always stood out to me was how quickly he jumped. A lot of the time, we talk about how high someone gets, but Chuck always seemed to get off the ground really damn fast.

像貨運列車那樣強壯是一回事，但是另外一件總能驚艷到我的事情就是巴克利跳得有多麼快。很多時候我們談論得都是一個人能跳多高，但是查克看上去總是能夠非常快得就跳離地面。

[–]HornetsBlaaa5 9 指標 1小時前

The only thing that stopped Charles was pizza

唯一能阻擋巴克利的就是披薩。

[–]Celticsdesmedt26 239 指標 6小時前

His transition to chubby sassy broadcaster has been flawless IMO

在我看來，他從運動員到一名肥的圓滾滿口跑火車的解說員的轉變毫無瑕疵。

[–][GSW] Klay ThompsonMrVanillaIceTCube 119 指標 4小時前*

是的，儘管查克現在是個大胖子了，但是作為一名歷史上最偉大的球員，他值得尊敬。這傢伙不可阻擋，在巴克利的巔峰里他和現在的全票MVP庫里同樣高效。講道理，在他76人4年的巔峰歲月里，查克場均25.7-12.5-4.0，其中有5個是進攻籃板，兩分命中率63.5%，真實命中率66.0%。

（然而糟糕的場均1.7次三分出手以及23.3%的命中率使他的總體命中率和有效命中率分別降到了只有59.0和60.3。）

庫里全票MVP的那一年，400記三分，逆天了的效率？但是有效命中率也只有63.0%，真實命中率66.9%。

如果我們忽略巴克利XJBT的三分，僅僅只考慮他的兩分，不管是從場上命中率還是總體命中率來說，他的效率都比庫里還高（63.5對比63.0的有效命中率，68.9對比66.9的真實命中率）。

另外真實命中率並不包含巴克利的「二加一」比率，我相信他是歷史里這一點上做的最好的球員之一，從而這會把他的真實命中率提高到70%。所以巴克利基本上就是一個大量得分，同時罰球命中率在75%左右的小喬丹。而且是作為一個身高6尺4的大前鋒，基本不去健身房，以及在活塞壞小子軍團全盛期年代的防守級別下做到的。

Yeah, Chuck is a goofy fat guy now, but he deserves respek as one of the greatest to ever play the game. Dude was unstoppable, as efficient in his prime as unanimous MVP Curry. Seriously.

Across his 4 year Philly peak, Chuck averaged 25.7-12.5-4.0 with 5.0 off rebs. 63.5% on 2 pointers, 66.0% TS.

(Awful 23.3% on 1.7 3PA per game tanked his FG% and eFG% to "merely" 59.0 and 60.3 respectively.)

Curry's unanimous MVP, 400 3's, godly efficient season? 63.0% eFG, 66.9% TS.

If we actually ignore Chuck's bricked 3s and just consider his 2s, he was more efficient than Curry, both from the field and overall (63.5 to 63.0 in eFG%, and 68.9 to 66.9 in TS%).

PLUS TS% doesn't account for his and-1 rate, which I'm sure was one of the best of all time, and would bump him over 70%. So Chuck was basically a volume-scoring, 75%-free-throwing DeAndre. And did it as a 6'4 PF who hardly worked out, in the heyday of Bad-Boys-Pistons-era physical D.

[–]NBABigPhoCup 9 指標 3小時前

People forget the NBA had to change the rules because of Chuck. He was the main reason for the 5 second back to the basket rule.

人們忘了NBA因為巴克利的存在而被迫修改規則，他是背身5秒規則存在的主要原因。

[–]NetsLifesabandthenyoudie 20 指標 4小時前

When they change the rules because of you you can quite literally call yourself unstoppable. Charles is a top ten player ever IMO, so absurdly efficient.

當聯盟因為你而修改規則時，那麼你便可以名副其實的稱自己不可阻擋了。巴克利在我心中是歷史前10的球員，太特么高效了。

[–][MIA] Hassan Whitesideheatup631 3 指標 3小時前

He was a mini Shaq with LeBron-sequel speed and VC-lite hops. In his Philly days he owned the paint and got whatever he wanted inside. There's a reason he's called the Round Mound of Rebound at 6'6"

巴克利是迷你版的沙克，外加勒布朗的速度和卡特的彈跳。在他76人的歲月里，禁區就是他的家，他能在裡面做任何自己想做的事情。巴克利被稱為6尺6的空中飛豬可是有原因的。

[–]Hawksjumboponcho 160 指標 6小時前

Barkley's in that Lebron/Wilt/Shaq class of athletic freaks, 6'6 270 lbs and could run past guards and get higher than 7 footers off vert.

巴克利的超強天賦是勒布朗/張伯倫/沙克級別的，6尺6的身高外加270磅的體重，卻跑的比後衛快，摸得比7尺中鋒高。

[–]Lakersvizzlypoof 60 指標 3小時前

Lol in every post Barkley is a different height. I've seen everything from 6'3 to 6'7 at this point. Why is it so hard to agree on a height for the man?

哈哈哈哈，每個關於巴克利的帖子里他的身高都不一樣。目前為止我已經看到從6尺3到6尺7了。為什麼同意一個關於巴克利的身高是如此之難呢？

[–]Spurskai2296 78 指標 3小時前

He's listed at 6'6 but he's definitely shorter, he's said it himself.

他註冊時是6尺6，但是肯定比這要矮，巴克利自己也說過。

[–]Supersonicsrossome13 9 指標 2小時前

I mean, here's him and Jordan and Jordan is 6'6.

我的意思是，這是他和喬丹的照片，而喬丹是實打實的6尺6。

[–][DEN] Fat LeverChamp_Bailey 235 指標 6小時前

Idk if anyone could really guard chuck tho so it's not really knocking draymond lol

我不知道是否有任何人能真的防住查克，所以這並不是對格林的不尊敬，哈哈。

[–]AllureFX[S] 92 指標 6小時前

Ive seen Hakeem shut him down a few times when he was on him (specially that 95 postseason comeback) but he wasnt defending him the whole game. And Hakeem is in the GOAT defender talks so if its that caliber of defender it takes to even hold u id see youre pretty damn unstoppable

我見過大夢防守他時鎖死過他幾次（尤其是在95年季後賽那個1-3大逆轉時），但是大夢並不是整場比賽都在防守巴克利。而且大夢是處於歷史上最偉大的防守者的討論中的，所以如果必須這種級別的防守者才能鎖死你的話，我會說你確實是不可阻擋。

[–]CelticsSharkTheMark 67 指標 4小時前

Hakeem also had like 7 inches on him lol

另外大夢也比巴克利高了7英寸，哈哈哈。

[–]Spursoscarjackson 38 指標 3小時前

And moved very well for his size too, most people his size wouldn't be able to keep up with Chuck.

而且作為一個這麼高的人來說，大夢的移動非常快，大多數像大夢這樣高的人無法跟住巴克利的腳步。

[–]jackets19 44 指標 3小時前

So it took literally the most nimble 7 footer in the world lol definitely unstoppable

所以實際上需要世界上最靈活的7尺大漢才能防住巴克利了，哈哈哈絕對的不可阻擋。

[–]TimberwolvesTdotGdot 30 指標 5小時前

To be fair, Chuck basically said you can never really "guard" elite scorers. Which, I totally agree with.

I bet Dray would have done a fantastic job and made life really hard on him, but Chuck would have gotten some.

講道理，查克實際上說的是，你永遠無法真正的「防住」頂尖的得分手，這點我是完全同意的。

我相信格林會在防守端打出非常好的表現，並讓巴克利的得分異常艱難，但是最終查克還是能得到那些分。

[–]Raptorsrumballtron 8 指標 4小時前

yep. even guys in the league now like derozan, they get their 25-30 most nights, just a matter of how hard they have to work for it and how much it slows the team down as a whole when they do it on 5 extra shots.

是的，就算是像德羅贊這樣的傢伙，幾乎每晚也會拿到屬於自己的25~30分，只是在於拿到的過程有多艱難，以及當他們通過額外的出手拿到這些分數時，能把球隊整體節奏拖累多少罷了。

elite offensive players will always be better/more plentiful than elite defensive players.

頂尖的進攻球員總是比頂尖的防守球員要出色。

[–]RaptorsSparkman33 107 指標 6小時前

I agree with him. I think Barkley is the best offensive PF of all-time.

我同意，我認為巴克利是歷史上進攻最好的大前鋒。

[–]Warriors BandwagonCaptainHawkmed 109 指標 6小時前

I think it's stupid to single Draymond out though, like nobody could guard Chuck

Draymond might be one of the best options in the history of the NBA to do it, but Chuck was almost unstoppable

It's like laughing at Draymond not being able to guard prime Shaq. Anybody guarding Shaq 1-on-1 is laughable

我覺得這裡挑出格林來比較很蠢，因為沒人能防住查克。

格林也許是NBA歷史上去防守查克最好的選擇，但是巴克利仍然不可阻擋。

就好像嘲笑格林無法去防住巔峰的沙克一樣，任何單防沙克的人都是可笑的。

[–]Warriors BandwagonVega5Star 21 指標 4小時前

Singling out Draymond is a complement, they're talking about him because he's the best in the game defensively right now.

挑出格林來實際上是對他的一種稱讚，他們談論格林是因為他是目前為止聯盟中防守最好的。