Zi 字媒體

雅思寫作8分有這些就夠了

2021/12/25

yidianzixun

在英語考試的眾多項目中

不知道各位烤鴨最怵的是哪一項？

反正考神君最討厭的就是寫作了

眼看著時間一點點過去

筆下還是寫不出來一個單詞

提升雅思寫作能力1

Task Response(任務的完成情況)：

在這個方面最重要的是字數和審題。所以練習速度至關重要，考前一定要有限時寫作的體驗。審題方面，一定要看清題目的問題(包括到底有幾個問題，問題是辯論式的還是論說式的，辯論焦點是什麼)，可以把歷年考題拿出來做專門的審題訓練。

提升雅思寫作能力2

Coherence and Cohesion(文章的連貫性)：

段落劃分和連接詞訓練。在段落方面，一定要用符合英美寫作習慣的topic sentence + supporting sentences， reason + example的方式來寫作，連接詞方面，特別是轉折、因果、舉例有關的連接詞，要做專項的練習。

提升雅思寫作能力3

Lexical Resource(辭彙的多樣性)

Grammatical Range and Accuracy(語法句式的準確性和多樣性)：

這兩點都與考生的英語基本功有關，短期內很難有實質性突破。很多考生採取背單詞和看語法書的方法，但因為非常枯燥也堅持不了多久且沒有什麼成效。

這裡給大家的建議是：第一，通過作文習作並讓有經驗的老師批改，找出屬於自己的在語法和辭彙方面的問題，發現一個問題解決一個問題，並在老師的指導下配合相關的有針對性的語法和辭彙學習。第二，一定要擯棄用「大詞」、「難句」的強迫心態。

但是

只有方法論是遠遠不夠的

範文在手，寫作我有！

來欣賞一下8分作文都有哪些套路

It has long been argued amid the community: Which one counts more, authority or academy? Notwithstanding the fact that our current pedagogy is so much clinging to the central committee, the educational system is in a blockbuster amount of outcry for reform. Does the temporary system still embrace rationality? Or is it the ripe juncture to refurnish it out and out? I personally took a deep look in it.

In the showdown between authority and academy, the former arguably outweighs the latter. Politics is a compulsory course in all kinds of enrollment examinations as well as all levels of educational institutions. The government, or a commander-in-chief to be vivid, needs to be held accountable for the stability of society. Education is by all means an almighty tool to incubate a behaving generation. With social development gaining momentum, a farsighted power base generally with a broader scope than the individuals, needs to build up particular majors specializing in fledgling domains involving cleaning energy, high-tech innovation, interpretation, to name but a few. Trained personnel in such fields are usually more fit into the society.

Arguments being articulated above though, academy-oriented teaching methodology is so far still reputed for its own merits. With teachers gaining more says in selecting knowledge, the students will presumably be inculcated with a more objective perception of the curriculum. Without authority barging in, the possibility of the impartiality being jeopardized is excluded for the mission of serving the regime is no longer valid. Only under such circumstance can the intrinsic value of the subject be authentically and manifested to the thirsty learners in an untangled manner. An untarnished and pristine academic ambience is colossally demanding by numerous pundits for the sake of equity and truth.

To sum up, there's no such inception that is appropriate to be dubbed "sheerly right" or "starkly wrong" . The righteous one solely lies in the rationality of adapting it. Authority, in China's case, can never be an outlier standing by the side of academic circle owing to its unique national condition.